Consumer Inquiry
Dear Team,
I am looking for guidance in choosing between the base HTK variant of the Kia Syros and the Mahindra XUV3XO MX3 Pro. Which vehicle provides superior overall value considering engine performance, safety features, cabin space, and comfort? Additionally, I want to evaluate aspects such as long-term reliability, fuel efficiency, and ownership costs. Which would be the smarter option for a combination of city and occasional highway driving?
Regards,
Jagdeesh B, Gurgaon
Performance Comparison
Insights from Autocar India: The Mahindra XUV3XO impresses with its remarkable balance of ride quality and handling. It not only delivers a robust feel but effectively absorbs bumps and rough road conditions. Interestingly, despite having a lower power output than the Kia, the XUV3XO’s 1.2-litre turbo-petrol engine demonstrates superior performance, as indicated by its faster acceleration times. However, some users may find the front seats less comfortable compared to those in the Syros, and the XUV3XO has the least boot space in its category.
Safety Ratings
Both models have received a commendable 5-star rating in crash tests conducted by Bharat NCAP. This rating signals a strong commitment to passenger safety in both SUVs, assuring potential buyers of their reliability on the road.
Feature Set
In terms of equipment, the Kia Syros HTK variant boasts a tire pressure monitoring system, a larger touchscreen interface, a reverse camera, and both front and rear parking sensors, which are not available in the XUV3XO. Conversely, exclusive features of the XUV3XO MX3 Pro variant include a sunroof, LED headlights, cruise control, and a wireless charging option.
Interior and Comfort
The Kia Syros impresses with its contemporary, spacious, and well-lit cabin interior. Its boxy design contributes to a feeling of expansive space, while its seats provide a greater level of comfort, and the overall quality of materials and craftsmanship is elevated in comparison to the Mahindra. However, a notable drawback of the Kia is its fuel efficiency; test results indicated a return of 9.1 km/l in urban driving and 12.6 km/l on the highway, which falls short when compared to the XUV3XO, which achieved 10.4 km/l and 14.9 km/l respectively. If fuel efficiency is crucial to you, the XUV3XO may prove to be the more economical choice.
Performance and Efficiency Table
| Kia Syros vs Mahindra XUV 3XO: Performance and Efficiency | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kia Syros | Mahindra XUV 3XO | |
| Acceleration | ||
| 0-60 kph | 5.27 sec | 5.07 sec |
| 0-100 kph | 12.37 sec | 11.58 sec |
| Rolling Acceleration | ||
| 20-80 kph | 11.17 sec | 10.74 sec |
| 40-100 kph | 14.57 sec | 13.38 sec |
| Fuel Efficiency | ||
| City | 9.1 km/l | 10.4 km/l |
| Highway | 12.6 km/l | 14.9 km/l |
Further Insights
Additional Content Available:
Kia Syros Review: Ace of Space
Kia Syros Video Review
Mahindra XUV 3XO Video Review
Mahindra XUV 3XO Review: Feature and Power-Packed Compact SUV
